Posted in Biotech, Genzyme, Novartis, Pharma, Pharma News, Pharmaceutical, Sanofi-Aventis, Top News, tagged fosamax, Genzyme, Gilead sciences, Multaq, Reclast on March 25, 2010|
*****
TODAY’S NEWS
What about those bone fracture risks with biophosphonate drugs? The jury is still out – A new study gives reassuring news about the safety of Fosamax and Reclast, bone-building drugs taken by millions of American women. It found that long-term use does not significantly raise the risk of a rare type of fracture near the hip…more
Monthly hepatitis C treatment looking promising – Human Genome Sciences Inc. said Wednesday a midstage study of the potential hepatitis C treatment Zalbin showed a monthly dose of the drug candidate could be as effective as a weekly dose of the standard treatment. The Rockville, Md., company said interim results from the study support evaluation of the monthly dose in a bigger, late-stage trial. The midstage study was conducted by Novartis, which is developing the drug with Human Genome Sciences. It combined the drug with ribavirin in 391 patients with forms of chronic hepatitis C…more
Massive Multaq Mess Might Mean Major Meltdown – The scale of Sanofi-Aventis (SNY)’s Multaq mess is starting to become apparent: The heart drug, hailed by the company as a €1 billion-plus blockbuster prior to its launch, may miss Wall Street sales estimates by as much as €1.3 billion, according to analysts at Jefferies International. When investors wake up and downgrade their expectations for the atrial fibrillation drug, Sanofi’s stock may suffer, they say…more
Genzyme – feeling fines.
RECOMMENDED
Employee Assessment – including Executive Management assessment – Impactiviti’s vendor/partners have just what you need for top assessment programs and services. Contact us (stevew at impactiviti dot com, or phone at 973-947-7429) for recommendations.
PLUS
Another reason to like Gilead Sciences (besides the fact that they have the best logo in the industry) – they actually have a rational pay plan for their top executive. What would it look like if pharma upper executive pay were based on annual performance for these measures: Profitability ratio (earnings vs. # of employees – something Gilead excels at, by the way); company share increase over a 3-year running average; and regulatory compliance? We might then see real pay-for-performance!
JUST FOR FUN
———-
Subscribe to the Impactiviti blog via e-mail (which will bring you Impactiviti Daily – a brief of the day’s top pharma news)
Visit the Impactiviti Job Board
Sign up for the Impactiviti Connection twice-monthly e-newsletter (see sample)
*****
Read Full Post »