• Home
  • About Steve Woodruff
  • Contact
  • About Impactiviti

Impactiviti blog

Pharma needs? Ask Steve.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Pulling it Through
Impactiviti Daily 100809 »

Those Dreaded Capabilities Presentations!

October 7, 2009 by Steve Woodruff

I’ve been on both sides of them. Trying to win immediate or future new business by impressing a prospective client, or evaluating vendors who are on the other side of the table.

This week one of my (pharma) clients asked a great couple of questions about these presentations. Because my response will be a bit involved, and because I’d like your input as well, I thought I’d just turn it into a blog post.

What has been your experience with vendor capability presentations? I am really interested in your perspective about the “standard”. Do you see this as a pure review of competencies or should there be an element of “sales and salesmanship” associated?

What I have seen is that, quite often, expectations are not clearly spelled out – so vendors are left to guess (a bit too much, usually) about what they should be presenting. I’m going to put the onus to improve this situation mainly on the client side; but vendors should not be shy about trying to lay the groundwork upfront as well.

Here are the questions I think you should answer for yourself, before reaching out to vendors for a presentation:

    1. Is this presentation for a specific near-term definable project, or are we looking (in general) to add to our suite of potential providers for future projects?
    2. What are the top three things we are looking for in a short-term or down-the-road provider? What are the next three things that matter most?
    3. What are “showstoppers” that would eliminate a potential provider from contention? Can we find out that information up-front, before everyone invests a lot of time and effort into a face-to-face presentation that is a lost cause?
    4. Can we screen for a smaller pool of potential providers by having a series of on-line presentations that will cover the basics?
    5. If there is a specific project on the table, and you are looking for a short-term provider for that project;
    – have you created an RFP to clearly spell out the parameters for the project? (see this tab on the Impactiviti site for resources on RFP creation)

    - is the capabilities presentation a follow-on to a submitted proposal?

    - in the presentation, what are you mainly looking for? General company overview? Re-cap and explanation of proposal? Creativity of provider? Consultative discussion? Price negotiations? Company culture/chemistry? New ideas? Interaction with a full development team? Song and dance and balloons? Actually TELL the prospective providers what you want to see and do in the meeting, and structure an agenda that maps to your plan.

    - consider creating a “scorecard” for your (client) team so that everyone is evaluating similar specific capabilities, as well as giving more general, subjective opinions.

I do recognize that there are different “standards” in different industries or divisions. In pharma, for instance, capabilities presentations for Training tend to be more cerebral and factual, while in Marketing there is generally more flash and glitter. I’d like to see training providers amp up the creativity a bit, frankly – some of the capabilities I’ve had to sit through were snoozefests. All of it is a form of “selling”, of course – but I find that the consultative approach, by and large, is far more effective than the hard sell when doing these types of presentations (ask me sometime about the unorthodox consultative “capabilities presentation” I decided to do one day!)

Be aware that it is quite costly, in time and dollars, for vendors to come on-site for capabilities presentations; and it is an investment of your (client) time as well. Take every step possible to make sure that only well-matched vendors are brought in for live presentations, with clear expectations and directions given up front. Marching a bunch of vendors through a room who don’t have a clear grasp of the goals of the meeting is a frustrating experience for all involved. The more pro-actively you map out what you’re looking for, the better-targeted the presentations will be.

What have I missed? Add your input in the comments – both client-side and vendor-side!

And, yes, I do consult with pharma/biotech clients on vendor selection strategies and RFP design, if you want to improve your vendor relationship practices!

———-

Subscribe to the Impactiviti blog via e-mail (which will bring you Impactiviti Daily – a brief of the day’s top pharma news)

Sign up for the Impactiviti Connection twice-monthly e-newsletter (see sample)

Connect with Steve Woodruff

About these ads

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Consulting, Right-sourcing, Sales training, Vendor Selection | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on October 8, 2009 at 8:01 am Robin Sanders

    Great article Steve and you make some good points. We have found the most effective approach to be a call with the prospective client to understand their specific needs or requirements of a vendor partner before we come in and do the capabilities presentation. This small investment of their time upfront ensures that we can tailor our presentation to meet their specific needs and can maximize the value of the interaction for both parties.

    Of course this doesn’t always happen so sometimes the PowerPoint slide deck has to be brought out. In these cases we have worked hard to minimize the number of slides (under 10 is ideal IMHO) and reduce text and maximize visual elements. We are also working on a project to do away with PowerPoint completely. I know this is a bold move but we have some cool digital tools that we’ve developed for our clients that we plan to leverage. The idea is to move away from a static, linear presentation to a highly visual presentation format that organizes and presents relevant capabilities content that is driven by the vendor/customer conversation.


    • on October 9, 2009 at 12:23 pm Jeff Tucker

      Steve,

      Our group has a practice of conducting as much upfront research and due diligence as possible before a capabilities presentation or RFP response. This research is a combination of searching through information in the public domain, talking with client resources, and querying our colleagues to see what they might contribute.

      It can take a considerable amount of time and financial investment to respond to an RFP so it is imperative that we position ourselves to understand the client, the business issues, required results and how those results will be measured.


  2. on November 16, 2009 at 2:21 pm Should You Ever Bypass an RFP Process?

    [...] Those Dreaded Capabilities Presentations! (impactiviti.wordpress.com) [...]



Comments are closed.

  • Welcome!


    Steve Woodruff
    sw
    President, Impactiviti
    Pharmaceutical Connection Agent
  • Connect with Steve Woodruff


    SteveWoodruff.com
  • Testimonials


    “Steve Woodruff is one of the most “networked” people I’ve found in pharmaceutical training. His communications are always smart and targeted, and I value his professional partnership.” -Jennifer Zinn, Director, Worldwide Marketing, Clinical Laboratory, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics

    Read More Testimonials
  • Free ebook! Getting Started with Social Networking

  • Subscribe!

    Subscribe in a reader
  • Subscribe via e-mail

    Subscribe to Impactiviti blog by Email
  • Subscribe to our e-newsletter

    View our Archive
    Email Marketing by Constant Contact®

  • Bookmark



  • Recent Posts

    • Is Pharma Sales Dead?
    • We Do Everything…Just Like Everybody Else!
    • Create Your Vendor Map
    • Create Your Vendor Funnel
    • Friday Notes 3_8_13
    • Fresh Job Postings
    • On Writing Well
    • Let’s Talk
    • Successful Vendor Management – Measuring Success
    • Successful Vendor Management – Define Your Terms
  • Recent Comments

    Glen Drummond on Is Pharma Sales Dead?
    Andrew Nemiccolo (@n… on Is Pharma Sales Dead?
    DenVan on We Do Everything…Just Li…
    Steve Woodruff (@swo… on We Do Everything…Just Li…
    Steve Woodruff (@swo… on We Do Everything…Just Li…
  • Archives

    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
  • Categories

    • Abbott
    • Advertising
    • After Hours
    • Allergan
    • Amgen
    • Amylin
    • Assessment
    • AstraZeneca
    • Avandia
    • Bayer
    • Biotech
    • Blogging
    • Blogs
    • BMS
    • Boehringer Ingelheim
    • book review
    • Branding
    • Bristol Myers
    • Business
    • Career planning
    • Celgene
    • Cephalon
    • Communications
    • Conference
    • Consulting
    • Covidien
    • Daiichi Sankyo
    • Depression
    • Diabetes
    • DTC
    • eLearning
    • Eli Lilly
    • Entrepreneur
    • ePatients
    • epharma
    • Ethics
    • facebook
    • FDA
    • Forest Labs
    • Friday Collection
    • Fun
    • Genentech
    • Genzyme
    • Glaxosmithkline
    • GSK
    • Healthcare
    • Impactiviti
    • Inspiration
    • Interview
    • iPad
    • J&J
    • Job
    • Job Board
    • John Mack
    • Johnson and Johnson
    • Lilly
    • Marketing
    • Medical Devices
    • Medicine
    • Meetings
    • Merck
    • Mobile
    • Music
    • Musings
    • Networking
    • News
    • No Bad Training
    • Novartis
    • Novo Nordisk
    • Obesity
    • Oncology
    • Outsourcing
    • Parenting
    • Paul Potts
    • Personal
    • Peter Rost
    • Pfizer
    • Pharma
    • Pharma News
    • Pharmaceutical
    • Project Management
    • Purdue
    • Recommendations
    • Red Cross
    • Reviews
    • Right-sourcing
    • Roche
    • Sales
    • Sales training
    • Sanofi-Aventis
    • Scandal
    • Schering
    • Social Media
    • SPBT
    • Spoof
    • Starting a business
    • Statins
    • Takeda
    • Technology
    • The Pharma Side
    • Top News
    • Training
    • Training Needs
    • Twitter
    • Uncategorized
    • Vendor Management
    • Vendor Selection
    • Video
    • Web
    • Webinar
    • Wyeth
    • Wyth
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
    Alltop, all the top stories
  • Pages

    • About Impactiviti
    • About Steve Woodruff
    • Contact

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: